Development & Reproduction
Korean Society of Developmental Biology
Review

Analysis of Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor Expression in Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) against Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus

Kyung-Hee Kimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-3255, Sulhye Parkhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-6485-5805, Jong-Won Parkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-7632, Minhwan Jeonghttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-2987-998X, Julan Kimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1964-9486, Hyejin Kimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-0034, Jeong-Ho Leehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-3748, Dain Lee†https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5675-8000
Fish Genetics and Breeding Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Geoje 53334, Korea
Corresponding author Dain Lee, Fish Genetics and Breeding Research, Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Geoje 53334, Korea Tel: +82-55-639-5813, Fax: +82-55-639-5809, E-mail: gene419@korea.kr

© Copyright 2023 The Korean Society of Developmental Biology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Mar 05, 2023 ; Revised: Apr 28, 2023 ; Accepted: Jun 06, 2023

Published Online: Jun 30, 2023

Abstract

Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) mediates the transfer of polymeric immunoglobulin to protect organisms and is one of the most important mucosal effectors. In this study, the developmental stage- and tissue-specific expression of pIgR were observed before virus inoculation in olive flounder. pIgR was gradually expressed until the formation of immune tissue, exhibiting high expression in the late juvenile period; thereafter, pIgR expression gradually decreased and exhibited high expression in the spleen and skin. Moreover, pIgR expression after viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus infection was high in the kidney and spleen tissues at high density and low at low density. The results of this study can provide a basis for future studies on breeding density, virus expression, and immune system studies in fish.

Keywords: Olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus; Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR); Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV); Stocking densities

INTRODUCTION

The olive flounder is a marine fish belonging to the flounder family, and is a representative Korean cultured-fish species that accounts for over 40% of cultured fish in Korea. Olive flounder farming has become a fast-growing food production sector, with health management of fish being crucial for sustainable industrial growth. However, competition in olive flounder farming is gradually declining due to an increase in the incidence of various diseases, deterioration of water quality due to environmental pollution, and labor and production costs. Moreover, the increase in breeding density to reduce production costs has affected the growth rate, feed intake rate, productivity, and survival rate of fish (Refstie, 1977; Rowland et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2015; Seo, 2020). In particular, mass mortality and diseases have been observed in fish due to the stress caused by an increase in breeding density (Holm et al., 1990; Björnsson, 1994; Noble & Summerfelt, 1996).

Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV), which causes mass mortality of farmed olive flounder, has a wide host range, including several fish species (Lee et al., 2007). VHSV is transmitted via water, urine, sperm, and ovarian fluid infected with VHSV as well as through infected live fish (Rovid, 2007). Infected fish exhibit the following symptoms: dark body color, exotometriosis, bleeding at the base of the fin, and bleeding in the internal organs and other tissues (Isshiki et al., 2001; Crane, 2006; Groocock, 2007; Duesund et al., 2010).

The immune system of aquatic animals enables them to continuously interact with microorganisms, adapt to changes in various environments, and detect and effectively defend against external pathogens (Rombout et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2020). Lymph organs in fish include the intestines, skin, and gills, and a part of the larynx also exhibits an induction function (Rombout et al., 1993). Mucosal surfaces, such as lymphoid organs, constitute the first line of defense, and mucosal health in fish is important for immunity (Rombout et al., 2014).

In the mucosa, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR), a key component of immune defense, binds to Polymeric Immunoglobulin (pIg), enters the cell, is surrounded by endosomes, and mediates polymeric IgA (pIgA) transcytosis into the luminal surface of epithelial cells. Secretory component (SC) and IgA combine to form secretory IgA (sIgA), which is released into the mucosa (Kaetzel, 2001; Kim, 2003). The transcytosis of pIgA by pIgR blocks the attachment and invasion of potential pathogens and promotes the intracellular neutralization of viruses and bacteria, ensuring that sIgA functions as an immunological barrier (Mazanec et al., 1993; Lamm, 1997; Kaetzel, 2001; Kim, 2003). Moreover, secreted immunoglobulins (sIgs) are considered key defense molecules that bind to mucosal bacteria and neutralize antigens during the immune exclusion process (Kelly et al., 2017). SC, a soluble proteolytic portion of the extracellular domain of membrane-bound pIgR, can protect against proteolysis by pIgR-mediated epithelial cell-associated transcytosis and pIgA-associated SC (Brandtzaeg, 1985; Mostov, 1994; Mostov & Kaetzel, 1999). pIgR is a glycoprotein formed in the crude vesicle of mucosal epithelial cells and is expressed outside the base of secretory cells with domains and binds to polymeric immunoglobulins (Mostov et al., 1980; Mostov & Kaetzel, 1999). Previous studies have reported pIgR in various fish, such as Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio), dojo loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus), fugu (Takifugu rubripes), olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus), orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coiides), rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) and zebrafish (Daniorerio); however, detailed investigations have not been performed (Hamuro et al., 2007; Rombout et al., 2008; Feng et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2018). Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the expression of pIgR in olive flounder during different developmental stages and in different types of tissues. We also investigated the expression of pIgR in VHSV-infected fish according to breeding density to elucidate the role of pIgR in olive flounder immunity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Fish breeding

Olive flounder were obtained from the Fish Breeding Research Center of the National Academy of Fisheries Science and bred in a 5-ton round tank (water temperature: 16±5°C), with a 15-h photoperiod and a 9-h dark cycle. The fish were fed commercial feeds of various sizes according to their growth stage. To observe the expression of pIgR at different developmental stages, whole body samples of olive flounder were collected until 50 day after hatching (DAH) from eggs, and the samples were placed in TRI-Solution™ (TS200-001, Bio Science Technology, Seongnam, Korea) and stored at −80°C until further use. Additionally, for tissue-specific expression analysis, tissue samples from the eyes, fins, gills, heart, intestine, kidney, liver, muscle, skin, spleen, and stomach were collected from 8-month-old healthy olive flounder (total length approximately 30 cm, n=3) and stored at −80°C in TRI-Solution™ until further use.

2. Artificial infection of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) by breeding density

To analyze pIgR expression in artificially infected fish according to breeding density, 8-month-old healthy olive flounders (total length approximately 30 cm, n=3) were acclimatized to a 3-ton round tank and fasted the day before the experiment. The experimental group was inoculated with 100 μL of VHSV suspension (104.8 TCID50 virus/fish), and the control group was inoculated with 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (Kong et al., 2009). According to the standard manual for olive flounder farming and Eh (2011), breeding density was categorized as follows: high-density (coverage rate 3), standard-density (coverage rate 1), and low-density (coverage rate 0.34) (Kim et al., 2016). Tissue-sampling of the kidneys and spleen was performed every 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h for 10 days. The fish were anesthetized using 15 ppm MS-222 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and each tissue was stored at −80°C for further experiments (Noh et al., 2017).

3. qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from each sample using the TRI-Solution™, and cDNA was synthesized using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). qRT-PCR was performed according to the method described by Kim et al. (2021), and the 18S rRNA gene was used as the internal standard control. mRNA expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Pfaffl, 2001). The primers for the experiment were designed using the Primer3 program and the NCBI database (Rozen & Skaletsky, 2000). The nucleotide sequence of the primers is as follows: pIgR primer (Gene bank, HM536144.1), forward: 5′-AGCCTCAGTATGCCAGCAAT-3′; reverse: 5′-GCACCTGTACCACCCAGAGT-3′ and 18S rRNA primer (Gene bank, EF126037.1), forward: 5′-ATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGGTG-3′; reverse: 5′-CACACGTGATCCAGTCAGT-3′. The results of this experiment were statistically analyzed using R 3.0.1 software (Okorie et al., 2013). The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to test the normality of the data, and it was found that the normality test was not violated (p<0.05). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to verify the statistical significance of the difference between the means of the groups. When significance was detected (p<0.05), a multiple range test was performed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD). All data are expressed as mean±standard error, and p-values indicate the statistical significance for all analyses. This article has been approved by IACUC by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee (2020-NIFS-IACUC-17).

RESULTS

1. pIgR expression according to developmental stages of olive flounder

The purpose of this experiment was to elucidate the innate immune response of olive flounder by investigating pIgR expression according to the developmental stage. The mRNA expression of pIgR was quantitatively analyzed using pIgR-specific primers at different developmental stages, and the expression was compared to that of egg (=1). We observed that pIgR expression gradually increased from 0 DAH, and exceeded 30-fold after 10. The highest expression was observed on 25 DAH, after which the expression rapidly decreased; moreover, between 30 DAH and 50 DAH, a gradual decrease in the expression was observed.

2. pIgR expression according to tissue

The purpose of this experiment was to elucidate tissue-specific immune responses of olive flounder by investigating pIgR expression in different tissues. Tissue-specific mRNA expression was quantitatively analyzed using pIgR-specific primers, and the expression was compared to that in the eyes (=1). pIgR expression was the lowest in the fins and eyes and the highest in the spleen. Moreover, the liver, intestine, and skin exhibited 10-fold higher expression than the eyes. In other tissues (gills, heart, kidney, muscle, and stomach), the expression was 2–8 times higher than that in the eyes.

3. Expression of pIgR in artificially infected fish according to breeding density

To study the immune response of fish artificially infected with VHSV according to breeding density, pIgR expression was investigated in artificially infected fish bred at different densities. pIgR mRNA expression was quantitatively analyzed by density and time using pIgR-specific primers, and the expression was compared to that at 0 h (=1). The experiments were conducted using kidney and spleen tissues, which are highly correlated with immune response.

Control inoculated with phosphate buffered saline showed similar results to those at 0 h in density and time-dependent expression values (data not shown). The height in the high-density breeding tank initially increased and then decreased, but on day 6, pIgR expression was over 30 times higher than that at 0 h and then rapidly decreased. The height in the standard density breeding tank did not exhibit any significant change until day 3; however, pIgR expression more than doubled on day 4, exhibiting the highest expression on day 8 and then decreased rapidly. The height in the low-density breeding tank decreased from 0 h until day 2 of inoculation, then gradually increased on day 3; pIgR expression was double on day 7 and decreased thereafter.

In the spleen samples from the high-density breeding tank, pIgR expression increased over nine times on day 4 compared to that at 0 h and exhibited the highest expression on day 7. Subsequently, the expression decreased sharply, and on day 10, the expression was the same as that on day 1. The expression in the spleen samples from the standard-density breeding tank did not exhibit substantial change until day 1, but on day 2, pIgR expression increased over three times compared to that at 0 h of inoculation; the highest expression was observed on day 3, after which it gradually decreased. After day 7, the expression was lower than that at 0 h. The expression in the spleen samples from the low-density breeding tank remained the same or decreased until day 2, but increased from day 3, exhibiting the highest expression on day 5; after day 7, the expression was lower than that at 0 h.

DISCUSSION

Fish are susceptible to diseases caused by highly infectious pathogens and in poor rearing environments. High-density intensive fish farming methods in Korea have led to the deterioration of farm environments and increased the incidence of various diseases by inducing stress (Lee et al., 2002). Fish live in an aquatic environment, and their mucosal surface is exposed. Thus, from a young age, the surface acts as an invasion route for numerous microorganisms (Kim et al., 2020). Therefore, mucosal health is more important in fish than in other animals (Rombout et al., 2014). pIgR is an essential component of the immune system that mediates transdermal transport of slgs to protect organisms from environmental pathogens and is the most important mucosal effector (Xu et al., 2013; Sheng et al., 2022). In fish, plgR is a single transmembrane protein that consists of extracellular, transmembrane, and intracellular domains (Kaetzel et al., 1997; Hamburger et al., 2004). Fish plgR has two immunoglobulin-like domains, and olive flounder plgR has a unique structure (Wieland et al., 2004; Hamuro et al., 2007; Rombout et al., 2008; Feng et al., 2009; Tadiso et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2013).

In this study, pIgR was gradually expressed after hatching and exhibited a rapid increase in expression as the digestive tract entered the period of complete differentiation. We observed the highest expression at the stage where the lymphocytes were formed, i.e., the immune system developed (Fig. 1). The immune system in fish includes the liver, spleen, and kidneys; these organs along with the skin and gills are considered mucosal lymphoid organs (Goldblum, 1990). In case of marine fish, the order of development of the major lymphoid organs is kidneys, spleen, and thymus, and the timing of complete development of these organs determines the stage with full immune capacity, not just the morphological meaning (Nakanishi, 1986; Jósefsson & Tatner, 1993; Pulsford et al., 1994; Padrós & Crespo, 1996; Schroder et al., 1998; Zapata et al., 2006). The results of this study confirmed that pIgR expression gradually decreased after the complete development of the immune system but was maintained (Fig. 1). This shows that pIgR, as a key component of immune defense, plays an important role in the immune response of olive flounder after hatching. Moreover, in the present study, pIgR was expressed in all tissues of olive flounder, with the highest expression observed in the spleen and high expression in the skin, liver, and intestines (Fig. 2). These results were similar to those previously reported for olive flounder and other fish, and the high expression in immune tissues suggests that plgR is an important effector of the immune system (Rombout et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2018; Sheng et al., 2022).

dr-27-2-67-g1
Fig. 1. Expression analysis of pIgR mRNA in different development stage of olive flounder. The mRNA expression of pIgR was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the expression levels of 18S rRNA and pIgR at the egg stage were set as 1. Significance test (p<0.05) was performed through one-way ANOVA, and multiple range test was performed through Tukey’s HSD. pIgR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; HSD, honestly significant difference.
Download Original Figure
dr-27-2-67-g2
Fig. 2. Expression analysis of pIgR mRNA in different tissue of olive flounder. The mRNA expression of pIgR was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the expression levels of 18S rRNA and pIgR at the egg stage were set as 1. Significance test (p<0.05) was performed through one-way ANOVA, and multiple range test was performed through Tukey’s HSD. pIgR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; HSD, honestly significant difference.
Download Original Figure

Olive flounder is an economically important fish species in Asian countries, such as Japan, Korea, and China (Park et al., 2015). However, many infectious diseases have been reported in olive flounder depending on different breeding conditions, such as water temperature, density, and quality, and have caused heavy economic losses (Kim et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010). VHSV is a hemorrhagic septicemia virus, and the incidence of its infection is affected by culture density, water temperature, nutritional status, and water quality (Kim et al., 2021). In particular, high breeding density creates a conducive environment for the spread of diseases and causes mass mortality, whereas low density inhibits growth by reducing feed intake (Holm et al., 1990; Brock, 1992; Oh et al., 2013). Stress in fish is known to be closely related to immunity, and stress in fish due to high density increases both plasma cortisol level and reactive oxygen species formation, which induces oxidative stress (Vijayan et al., 1990; Braun et al., 2010; Psaltopoulou et al., 2010; Yarahmadi et al., 2015). Kim et al. (2016) set the coverage rate as the standard for calculating the stocking density. The kidneys and spleen exhibited high and low expression at high and low densities, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). Moreover, at low densities, pIgR expression decreased and increased after 1–2 days of the experiment (Figs. 3, 4). These results differ from those reported in previous studies that investigated IRF3 expression in the diseased state at different breeding densities (Kim et al., 2021). Moreover, diseased flatfish may exhibit different immune responses depending on the density and genes. The results of this study provide important basic data for determining breeding density in fish farming and for immunogenetic studies based on disease and breeding density.

dr-27-2-67-g3
Fig. 3. Expression analysis of pIgR mRNA in high (A), standard (B), low (C) stock density at kidney tissues of of olive flounder within post-VHSV injection. The mRNA expression of pIgR was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the expression levels of 18S rRNA and pIgR at the 0H stage were set as 1. Significance test (p<0.05) was performed through one-way ANOVA, and multiple range test was performed through Tukey’s HSD. pIgR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; VHSV, viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus; HSD, honestly significant difference.
Download Original Figure
dr-27-2-67-g4
Fig. 4. Expression analysis of pIgR mRNA in high (A), standard (B), low (C) stock density at spleen tissues of of olive flounder within post-VHSV injection. The mRNA expression of pIgR was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the expression levels of 18S rRNA and pIgR at the 0H stage were set as 1. Significance test (p<0.05) was performed through one-way ANOVA, and multiple range test was performed through v’s HSD. pIgR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; VHSV, viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus; HSD, honestly significant difference.
Download Original Figure

Conflict of interests

The author declares no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2023020).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Kim K-H, Lee D.

Data curation: Lee J-H.

Formal analysis: Kim K-H, Park S.

Methodology: Park J-W.

Software: Kim J, Kim H.

Validation: Kim K-H, Jeong M.

Investigation: Kim K-H, Park S.

Writing - original draft: Kim K-H.

Writing - review & editing: Kim K-H, Park S, Park J-W, Jeong M, Kim J, Kim H, Lee J-H, Lee D.

Ethics approval

This article has been approved by IACUC by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee (2020-NIFS-IACUC-17).

REFERENCES

1.

Björnsson B. 1994; Effects of stocking density on growth rate of halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) reared in large circular tanks for three years. Aquaculture. 123:259-270

2.

Brandtzaeg P. 1985; Role of J chain and secretory component in receptor-mediated glandular and hepatic transport of immunoglobulins in man. Scand J Immunol. 22:111-146

3.

Braun N, de Lima RL, Baldisserotto B, Dafre AL, de Oliveira Nuñer AP. 2010; Growth, biochemical and physiological responses of Salminus brasiliensis with different stocking densities and handling. Aquaculture. 301:22-30

4.

Brock JA. 1992; Current diagnostic methods for agents and diseases of farmed marine shrimp.In Proceedings of the Asian Interchange Program Workshop on the Diseases of Cultured Penaeid Shrimp. Oahu, HI. p. 209-231.

5.

Crane M. 2006 Chapter 2.1.5: Viral hemorrhagic septicaemia. Manual of diagnostic tests for aquatic animals. https://web.archive.org/web/20070206071904/http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/fmanual/A_00022.htmJul 16, 2007.

6.

Duesund H, Nylund S, Watanabe K, Ottem KF, Nylund A. 2010; Characterization of a VHS virus genotype III isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhychus mykiss) at a marine site on the west coast of Norway. Virol J. 7:19

7.

Eh YY. 2011; Productivity of the flounder stocking density on the flounder culture farms. J Fish Bus Adm. 42:85-96.

8.

Feng LN, Lu DQ, Bei JX, Chen JL, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu XC, Meng ZN, Wang L, Lin HR. 2009; Molecular cloning and functional analysis of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor gene in orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 154:282-289

9.

Goldblum RM. 1990; The role of IgA in local immune protection. J Clin Immunol. 10:64S-71S

10.

Groocock GH. 2007 Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia and Spring Viremia of Carp: Threats to aquaculture.Cornell University. Ithaca, NY: .

11.

Hamburger AE, West AP, Bjorkman PJ. 2004; Crystal structure of a polymeric immunoglobulin binding fragment of the human polymeric immunoglobulin receptor. Structure. 12:1925-1935

12.

Hamuro K, Suetake H, Saha NR, Kikuchi K, Suzuki Y. 2007; A teleost polymeric Ig receptor exhibiting two Ig-like domains transports tetrameric IgM into the skin. J Immunol. 178:5682-5689

13.

Holm JC, Refstie T, Bø S. 1990; The effect of fish density and feeding regimes on individual growth rate and mortality in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 89:225-232

14.

Isshiki T, Nishizawa T, Kobayashi T, Nagano T, Miyazaki T. 2001; An outbreak of VHSV (viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus) infection in farmed Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus in Japan. Dis Aquat Org. 47:87-99

15.

Jósefsson S, Tatner MF. 1993; Histogenesis of the lymphoid organs in sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 3:35-49

16.

Kaetzel CS. 2001; Polymeric Ig receptor: Defender of the fort or Trojan horse?. Curr Biol. 11:R35-R38

17.

Kaetzel CS, Blanch VJ, Hempen PM, Phillips KM, Piskurich JF, Youngman KR. 1997; The polymeric immunoglobulin receptor: Structure and synthesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 25:475-480

18.

Kelly C, Takizawa F, Oriol Sunyer J, Salinas I. 2017; Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) secretory component binds to commensal bacteria and pathogens. Sci Rep. 7:41753

19.

Kim KD, Kim DG, Kim SK, Kim KW, Son MH, Lee SM. 2010; Apparent digestibility coefficients of various feed ingredients for olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 43:325-330

20.

Kim KH, Cho DH, Joo MS, Choi KM, Park CI, Kim MC. 2020; Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) gene from Red sea bream Pagrus major. J Fish Mar Educ Res. 32:1153-1167

21.

Kim KH, Lee S, Park JW, Jung HS, Kim J, Yang H, Lee JH, Lee D. 2021; Analysis of tissue-specific interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) gene expression against viral infection in Paralichthys olivaceus. Dev Reprod. 25:235-244

22.

Kim KK, Hwang HK, Kim HC, Kim KW, Cho JW, Jung MH. 2016 Olive Flounder Culture Standard Manual.National Institute of Fisheries Science. Busan, Korea: .

23.

Kim SS, Lee JH, Kim KW, Kim KD, Lee BJ, Lee KJ. 2015; Effects of feed particle size, stocking density, and dissolved oxygen concentration on the growth of olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 48:314-321

24.

Kim SW. 2003 The effect of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor on eosinophil degranulation in respiratory syncytial virus infection of respiratory epithelial cells.Ph.D. DissertationKyung-Hee University. Seoul, Korea: .

25.

Kim WS, Kim SR, Kim D, Kim JO, Park MA, Kitamura SI, Kim HY, Kim DH, Han HJ, Jung SJ, Oh MJ. 2009; An outbreak of VHSV (viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus) infection in farmed olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus in Korea. Aquaculture. 296:165-168

26.

Kong HJ, Hong GE, Kim WJ, Kim YO, Nam BH, Lee CH, Do JW, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Kim KK. 2009; Cloning and characterization of hypusine-containing protein eIF5A from the olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 153:281-287

27.

Lamm ME. 1997; Interaction of antigens and antibodies at mucosal surfaces. Annu Rev Microbiol. 51:311-340

28.

Lee SM, Park CS, Bang IC. 2002; Dietary protein requirement of young Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Sci. 68:158-164

29.

Lee WL, Yun HM, Kim SR, Jung SJ, Oh MJ. 2007; Detection of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) from marine fish in the South Western Coastal area and East China Sea. J Fish Pathol. 20:201-209.

30.

Mazanec MB, Nedrud JG, Kaetzel CS, Lamm ME. 1993; A three-tiered view of the role of IgA in mucosal defense. Immunol Today. 14:430-435

31.

Mostov K, Kaetzel CS. 1999; Immunoglobulin transport and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor.In Mucosal Immunology. 2ndAcademic Press. San Diego, CA: p. 181-211

32.

Mostov KE. 1994; Transepithelial transport of immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Immunol. 12:63-84

33.

Mostov KE, Kraehenbuhl JP, Blobel G. 1980; Receptor-mediated transcellular transport of immunoglobulin: Synthesis of secretory component as multiple and larger transmembrane forms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 77:7257-7261

34.

Nakanishi T. 1986; Seasonal changes in the humoral immune response and the lymphoid tissues of the marine teleost, Sebastiscus marmoratus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 12:213-221

35.

Noble AC, Summerfelt ST. 1996; Diseases encountered in rainbow trout cultured in recirculating systems. Annu Rev Fish Dis. 6:65-92

36.

Noh GE, Kim WJ, Kim HC, Park CJ, Park JW. 2017; Daily rhythms and effect of short-term starvation on the of health parameters in olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 50:534-540.

37.

Oh DH, Song JW, Kim MG, Lee BJ, Kim KW, Han HS. 2013; Effect of food particle size, stocking density and feeding frequency on the growth performance of juvenile Korean rockfish Sebastes schlegelii. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 46:407-412

38.

Okorie OE, Bae JY, Kim KW, Son MH, Kim JW, Bai SC. 2013; Optimum feeding rates in juvenile olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, at the optimum rearing temperature. Aquac Nutr. 19:267-277

39.

Padrós F, Crespo S. 1996; Ontogeny of the lymphoid organs in the turbot Scophthalmus maximus: A light and electron microscope study. Aquaculture. 144:1-16

40.

Park HK, Kim SM, Lee DW, Jun LJ, Jeong JB. 2015; Monitoring of VHS and RSIVD in cultured Paralichthys olivaceus of Jeju in 2014. J Fish Mar Sci Educ. 27:897-889

41.

Pfaffl MW. 2001; A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45

42.

Psaltopoulou T, Ilias I, Alevizaki M. 2010; The role of diet and lifestyle in primary, secondary and tertiary diabetes prevention: A review of meta-analyses. Rev Diabet Stud. 7:26-35

43.

Pulsford A, Tomlinson MG, Lemaire-Gony S, Glynn PJ. 1994; Development and immunocompetence of juvenile flounder Platichthys flesus, L. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 4:63-78

44.

Refstie T. 1977; Effect of density on growth and survival of rainbow trout. Aquaculture. 11:329-334

45.

Rombout JHWM, Taverne-Thiele AJ, Villena MI. 1993; The gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): An immunocytochemical analysis. Dev Comp Immunol. 17:55-66

46.

Rombout JHWM, van der Tuin SJL, Yang G, Schopman N, Mroczek A, Hermsen T, Taverne-Thiele JJ. 2008; Expression of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) in mucosal tissues of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 24:620-628

47.

Rombout JHWM, Yang G, Kiron V. 2014; Adaptive immune responses at mucosal surfaces of teleost fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 40:634-643

48.

Rovid SA. 2007 Disease Factsheets: Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia. The Center for Food Security & Public Health. Lowa State University. Ames, IA: .

49.

Rowland SJ, Mifsud C, Nixon M, Boyd P. 2006; Effects of stocking density on the performance of the Australian freshwater silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus) in cages. Aquaculture. 253:301-308

50.

Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. 2000; Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.In In: Misener S, Krawetz SA, editors. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press. Totowa, NJ: p. 365-386

51.

Schroder MB, Villena AJ, Jorgensen TØ. 1998; Ontogeny of lymphoid organs and immunoglobulin producing cells in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Dev Comp Immunol. 22:507-517

52.

Seo J. 2020 Effects of stocking density on productivity and stress of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in recirculation aquaculture system.M.S. ThesisPukyong National University. Busan, Korea: .

53.

Sheng X, Guo Y, Zhu H, Chai B, Tang X, Xing J, Chi H, Zhan W. 2022; Transepithelial secretion of mucosal IgM mediated by polymeric immunoglobulin receptor of flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus): In-vivo and in-vitro evidence. Front Immunol. 13:868753

54.

Tadiso TM, Sharma A, Hordvik I. 2011; Analysis of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor- and CD300-like molecules from Atlantic salmon. Mol Immunol. 49:462-473

55.

Vijayan MM, Ballantyne JS, Leatherland JF. 1990; High stocking density alters the energy metabolism of brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Aquaculture. 88:371-381

56.

Wieland WH, Orzáez D, Lammers A, Parmentier HK, Verstegen MWA, Schots A. 2004; A functional polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in chicken (Gallus gallus) indicates ancient role of secretory IgA in mucosal immunity. Biochem J. 380:669-676

57.

Xu G, Zhan W, Ding B, Sheng X. 2013; Molecular cloning and expression analysis of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 35:653-660

58.

Yarahmadi P, Miandare HK, Hoseinifar SH, Gheysvandi N, Akbarzadeh A. 2015; The effects of stocking density on hemato-immunological and serum biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquacult Int. 23:55-63

59.

Yu Y, Liu Y, Li H, Dong S, Wang Q, Huang Z, Kong W, Zhang X, Xu Y, Chen X, Xu Z. 2018; Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in dojo loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus): Molecular characterization and expression analysis in response to bacterial and parasitic challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 73:175-184

60.

Zapata A, Diez B, Cejalvo T, Gutiérrez-de Frías C, Cortés A. 2006; Ontogeny of the immune system of fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 20:126-136

61.

Zhang YA, Salinas I, Li J, Parra D, Bjork S, Xu Z, LaPatra SE, Bartholomew J, Oriol Sunyer J. 2010; IgT, a primitive immunoglobulin class specialized in mucosal immunity. Nat Immunol. 11:827-835